Medication Audit - Care Homes
Answered 0 / 40(0% complete)
Score
0%
N/A counts as Yes (full credit). Unanswered reduces the score until completed.
Breakdown
0 Yes •0 No •0 N/A •40 Unanswered
Answers Overview
Questions
0/40 answeredQ1 | Unanswered
During observation and record review, are all medicines stored securely, organised safely, and accessible only to authorised staff in line with their storage requirements?
Evidence to check
- • Check locked cupboards, trolleys, rooms and medicine fridges during and after medication rounds.
- • Confirm medicines are not left unattended on worktops, trolleys, trays or in resident areas.
- • Check that internal and external medicines are separated and labelled clearly.
- • Check access arrangements and whether only authorised competent staff can access medicines.
- • Confirm storage arrangements match the medicine's requirements, including refrigeration, controlled drugs and topical medicines.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q2 | Unanswered
Across the last 7 days of records, have room and fridge temperatures been checked consistently, and where temperatures were outside the expected range, was timely action taken and recorded?
Evidence to check
- • Review daily room and fridge temperature logs for missing entries, repeated identical entries or retrospective completion.
- • Check whether out-of-range readings have a recorded action, escalation and outcome.
- • Confirm staff know the acceptable temperature ranges and what to do if readings are outside range.
- • Check thermometer calibration, fridge maintenance records or replacement actions where relevant.
- • Compare records with staff explanations to confirm the process is actually followed in practice.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q3 | Unanswered
Across a sample of residents, do MAR entries match what was actually administered, including the correct medicine, timing, dose, route, staff signature and any recorded reason for non-administration?
Evidence to check
- • Compare MAR charts with current prescriptions, stock balances and administration instructions.
- • Check for gaps, late signatures, missing codes, overwriting, unclear amendments or retrospective entries.
- • Cross-check care notes where doses were refused, delayed, omitted or administered differently.
- • Ask staff to explain selected MAR entries and confirm their explanation matches the record.
- • Where possible, compare observed practice during a medication round with the MAR documentation.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q4 | Unanswered
Across recent MAR chart reviews, are missing signatures, gaps, coding errors and late or omitted doses identified promptly and corrected through clear follow-up action?
Evidence to check
- • Review recent MAR audits, daily checks or manager spot checks.
- • Check whether gaps are investigated rather than simply signed later.
- • Look for recurring patterns involving the same resident, medicine, staff member, round or time of day.
- • Check whether actions are assigned, dated and followed up.
- • Confirm learning or corrective action has been shared with relevant staff.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q5 | Unanswered
Across a sample of staff, is competency in medicines administration supported by training, direct observation, supervision and recent practical assessment rather than training records alone?
Evidence to check
- • Check medication training certificates and dates for permanent, bank and agency staff where applicable.
- • Review practical competency assessments and evidence of observed medication rounds.
- • Check supervision notes for medication practice discussions, concerns or reassessment.
- • Confirm staff have been reassessed after errors, concerns, absence or changes in responsibility.
- • Ask staff practical medication questions linked to residents they support.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q6 | Unanswered
When medicines are refused, omitted, delayed or involved in an error, do staff know what to do and can records show that the resident was monitored, the issue was escalated and the outcome was documented?
Evidence to check
- • Review recent refusals, omissions, delays and medication errors on MARs and incident records.
- • Check whether staff documented the reason, immediate action, resident wellbeing checks and escalation.
- • Ask staff scenario-based questions about refusals, missed doses, wrong doses and late doses.
- • Check evidence of GP, pharmacist, senior staff, family or safeguarding escalation where required.
- • Confirm follow-up monitoring is recorded in daily notes or clinical records.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q7 | Unanswered
Across recent medication incidents, is there evidence that the response went beyond recording the event and included investigation, resident safety checks, learning and changes in day-to-day practice?
Evidence to check
- • Review incident forms, investigation notes and management reviews.
- • Check whether root causes were explored, not just attributed to 'staff error'.
- • Look for evidence of resident safety checks, medical advice, family communication and duty of candour where relevant.
- • Check team meeting notes, supervision records or learning briefings after incidents.
- • Confirm whether changes were implemented and reviewed for effectiveness.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q8 | Unanswered
When PRN medicines are administered, do records and staff explanations show they were given for a clear reason, within the agreed protocol, and reviewed afterwards for effect?
Evidence to check
- • Check PRN protocols are present, person-specific and available to staff administering the medicine.
- • Review MARs and care notes for the reason PRN medicine was given.
- • Check whether the outcome/effectiveness was recorded after administration.
- • Ask staff when they would give or withhold selected PRN medicines for current residents.
- • Look for repeated PRN use without review or escalation.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q9 | Unanswered
When new medicines are received into the home, do stock records, MAR charts and staff checks show that medicines are received, checked, recorded and made available without delay or confusion?
Evidence to check
- • Review receipt records, delivery notes and stock entries for recent medicines.
- • Check whether two staff checked medicines where the provider's procedure requires it.
- • Confirm MAR charts were updated accurately and promptly following receipt.
- • Check whether medicines were available for the next scheduled dose.
- • Ask staff how they deal with missing, incorrect or unclear medicines on delivery.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q10 | Unanswered
Across a sample of discontinued, expired or returned medicines, are disposal records complete and do stock balances show medicines were removed from active use promptly and safely?
Evidence to check
- • Check disposal/returns records against physical stock and MAR changes.
- • Look for expired medicines, discontinued medicines or duplicate stock still available for use.
- • Confirm controlled drug returns are recorded in line with the provider's procedure.
- • Check whether returns to pharmacy are documented and signed.
- • Ask staff how they prevent discontinued medicines from being administered in error.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q11 | Unanswered
When reviewing recent medication audits, is there evidence that audits are completed regularly and test real practice, not just whether paperwork exists?
Evidence to check
- • Review the last medication audits and check whether they include observation, staff questioning and record sampling.
- • Check whether audits identify practice issues such as interruptions, unsafe shortcuts or inconsistent recording.
- • Confirm audit samples cover different residents, medicines, staff and times of day.
- • Look for evidence that findings are discussed with staff and managers.
- • Check whether audit results are compared over time to identify trends.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q12 | Unanswered
Where medication audit issues are identified, do action plans lead to measurable improvement rather than repeated identification of the same problems?
Evidence to check
- • Review action plans linked to previous medication audits.
- • Check whether actions have owners, target dates and completion evidence.
- • Compare previous and current audit findings for repeated issues.
- • Look for follow-up checks confirming whether the action worked in practice.
- • Confirm staff can describe changes made because of audit findings.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q13 | Unanswered
Across a sample of residents, is there evidence that medication reviews by a pharmacist, GP or prescriber happen when required and result in clear changes, monitoring or follow-up?
Evidence to check
- • Check medication review dates and records for selected residents.
- • Look for review outcomes, changed medicines, stopped medicines or monitoring requirements.
- • Confirm MAR charts, care plans and staff handovers reflect the review outcome.
- • Check whether residents with high-risk medicines, polypharmacy or repeated PRN use are prioritised for review.
- • Ask staff how they know when a resident needs a medication review.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q14 | Unanswered
When speaking with residents or representatives and reviewing records, is there evidence that people are meaningfully involved in decisions about their medicines, including preferences, concerns and side effects?
Evidence to check
- • Review care plans and consent records for involvement in medication decisions.
- • Check records of discussions with residents, relatives, advocates or representatives.
- • Ask residents or representatives whether medicines are explained and concerns are listened to.
- • Look for evidence that preferences such as timing, format, swallowing needs or cultural considerations are recorded.
- • Check whether concerns about effectiveness or side effects were followed up.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q15 | Unanswered
When controlled drugs are administered, do observed practice and records show that required checks, witnessing, recording and stock reconciliation are completed correctly every time?
Evidence to check
- • Observe or review a controlled drug administration where possible.
- • Check the controlled drugs register against MAR entries and physical stock.
- • Confirm two signatures are recorded where required and entries are completed at the time of administration.
- • Look for corrections, gaps, unclear entries or retrospective recording.
- • Ask staff to explain the controlled drugs process using a current resident example.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q16 | Unanswered
Across a sample of controlled drugs, do storage arrangements, controlled drug register entries, balances and stock checks align without unexplained discrepancies?
Evidence to check
- • Check controlled drug cupboard security and access arrangements.
- • Compare physical stock with the controlled drug register and MAR chart.
- • Review frequency and quality of controlled drug stock checks.
- • Check how discrepancies were investigated and escalated.
- • Confirm discontinued or returned controlled drugs are recorded correctly.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q17 | Unanswered
For residents who self-administer medicines, do risk assessments, storage arrangements and staff monitoring checks show that the arrangement is safe and working in practice?
Evidence to check
- • Review self-administration risk assessments and review dates.
- • Check whether the person has secure storage and can access medicines safely.
- • Confirm staff monitoring checks are completed and meaningful.
- • Ask staff how they respond if the resident's ability changes or doses are missed.
- • Check whether the resident's views and preferences are reflected in the arrangement.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q18 | Unanswered
Where homely remedies are used, do records show that staff follow an agreed protocol, check suitability for the individual and monitor outcomes appropriately?
Evidence to check
- • Review the homely remedies policy, approved list and authorisation arrangements.
- • Check whether homely remedies are recorded on MARs or administration records.
- • Confirm staff check allergies, contraindications and current medicines before use.
- • Look for evidence of outcome monitoring and escalation if symptoms persist.
- • Ask staff when homely remedies must not be given.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q19 | Unanswered
Across a sample of residents, is allergy status clearly visible in care and medication records, and do staff actively check this before administration rather than relying on memory?
Evidence to check
- • Check allergy information on MAR charts, care plans and electronic records.
- • Look for contradictions or missing allergy information across records.
- • Observe whether staff check allergy status during administration.
- • Ask staff how they verify allergy information for a resident they support.
- • Check whether new or suspected allergies are escalated and recorded promptly.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q20 | Unanswered
When staff administer medicines to current residents, can they apply the five rights in practice - right person, medicine, dose, time and route - rather than only reciting them in theory?
Evidence to check
- • Observe staff completing identity, medicine, dose, time and route checks during a medication round.
- • Check use of photographs, MAR charts and resident confirmation where appropriate.
- • Ask staff to talk through the five rights using a real resident example.
- • Look for shortcuts such as pre-pouring, relying on memory or signing before administration.
- • Confirm staff pause and seek advice where anything does not match.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q21 | Unanswered
Across recent incidents and safeguarding records, were medication concerns referred externally where required, and was the rationale for referral or non-referral clearly documented?
Evidence to check
- • Review medication incidents, safeguarding logs and CQC notification records.
- • Check whether serious errors, harm, repeated concerns or neglect indicators were escalated appropriately.
- • Look for evidence of referral to safeguarding, CQC, GP, pharmacist or commissioning teams where relevant.
- • Confirm the rationale is documented where no external referral was made.
- • Check timeliness and completeness of notifications.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q22 | Unanswered
Do medication training records match staff practice, with evidence that training is current, relevant to the service and reinforced through supervision, observation and learning from incidents?
Evidence to check
- • Review training records for staff who administer or support with medicines.
- • Check whether training includes relevant topics such as PRN, controlled drugs, covert medicines, time-critical medicines and error response.
- • Compare training completion with competency assessments and observed practice.
- • Check whether agency or new staff have been assessed before administering medicines.
- • Look for refresher training or targeted learning following incidents or audit findings.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q23 | Unanswered
Do handover notes and shift discussions show that medication issues such as refusals, shortages, side effects, changes and follow-up actions are consistently communicated and acted on?
Evidence to check
- • Review handover notes, communication books and electronic shift records.
- • Check whether medication changes, refusals, missed doses or low stock are carried forward until resolved.
- • Ask incoming staff what current medication issues they need to follow up.
- • Look for gaps between MAR records, daily notes and handover communication.
- • Confirm actions are completed rather than repeatedly passed between shifts.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q24 | Unanswered
Across a sample of topical medicines, creams and patches, do body maps, application records and observation confirm they are applied correctly, at the right frequency and to the right site?
Evidence to check
- • Review topical MARs, body maps and care plans for current instructions.
- • Check whether application sites, frequency and rotation instructions are clear.
- • Look for missing signatures or vague records such as 'cream applied' without site detail.
- • Observe practice or ask staff to explain how they apply selected topical medicines.
- • Check whether patches are dated, sited correctly and old patches removed where applicable.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q25 | Unanswered
When a resident is absent, away from the home, admitted to hospital or refuses medication, do staff follow a clear process that protects continuity of care and ensures medicines are reconciled on return?
Evidence to check
- • Review records for recent hospital admissions, appointments, home visits or absences.
- • Check whether medicines sent with the resident were documented and signed out.
- • Confirm medicines were reconciled on return or after discharge.
- • Check communication with hospital, GP, pharmacy, family or transport staff where relevant.
- • Look for missed, duplicated or delayed doses linked to absence or transfer.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q26 | Unanswered
During spot checks, are medication trolleys clean, locked when unattended, stocked appropriately and used in a way that supports safe administration rounds?
Evidence to check
- • Inspect medication trolleys during and outside medication rounds.
- • Check cleanliness, organisation, lock use and whether medicines are left unattended.
- • Review trolley check records and cleaning schedules.
- • Look for loose tablets, expired items, confidential records left visible or mixed resident medicines.
- • Observe whether the trolley is positioned and used safely during administration.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q27 | Unanswered
Across incidents, hospital admissions, GP contacts and daily notes, is there any evidence that medication issues may have contributed to deterioration, distress, overdose, missed doses, side effects or avoidable admission, and has this been reviewed?
Evidence to check
- • Review recent hospital admissions, falls, deterioration, behavioural changes and incident records.
- • Check whether medication causes or side effects were considered as part of the review.
- • Look for GP/pharmacist advice, medication review or monitoring after concerns.
- • Check whether family or representative communication was recorded where relevant.
- • Confirm learning and preventative actions were recorded and followed up.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q28 | Unanswered
Across the last month of MAR audits and daily checks, are there repeated patterns of late doses, omitted doses, coding errors or unsigned administrations, and is there evidence of corrective action at staff or system level?
Evidence to check
- • Review MAR audits, daily MAR checks and medication incident trends.
- • Look for repeated issues by staff member, resident, medicine, shift, round or unit.
- • Check whether causes such as staffing, interruptions, stock delays or unclear instructions were explored.
- • Confirm corrective actions were taken and reviewed for effectiveness.
- • Check whether repeated issues were escalated to management.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q29 | Unanswered
When shown examples of common side effects or adverse drug reactions relevant to current residents, can staff recognise concerns and explain what action they would take?
Evidence to check
- • Ask staff scenario questions linked to medicines currently used in the service.
- • Check staff awareness of high-risk medicines and common side effects.
- • Review records where side effects or adverse reactions were suspected or reported.
- • Check whether concerns were escalated to GP, pharmacist or senior staff.
- • Confirm staff know how to monitor and document resident changes after medication concerns.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q30 | Unanswered
Where covert medication is in use, do records show a lawful best-interest decision, prescriber or pharmacist input, clear administration guidance and evidence of regular review in practice?
Evidence to check
- • Review mental capacity assessments and best-interest decision records.
- • Check involvement of prescriber, pharmacist, family or representatives as appropriate.
- • Confirm the MAR and care plan give clear instructions on how medicines are administered covertly.
- • Look for review dates and evidence that covert administration remains necessary.
- • Ask staff how covert medicines are given safely and discreetly for the specific resident.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q31 | Unanswered
Can staff describe a recent medication error, omission or near miss from this service and explain what changed afterwards in day-to-day practice?
Evidence to check
- • Ask a sample of staff about recent medication learning in the service.
- • Compare staff accounts with incident records, meeting minutes or supervision notes.
- • Check whether the learning led to a practical change, not just a reminder to be careful.
- • Look for consistency across staff responses.
- • Confirm changes were embedded through follow-up checks or audits.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q32 | Unanswered
When residents or families raise concerns about medicines, do records show those concerns were listened to, investigated, responded to and used to improve care?
Evidence to check
- • Review complaints, compliments, feedback records and daily notes for medication concerns.
- • Check whether concerns about effectiveness, side effects, timing or communication were investigated.
- • Look for responses to residents or families and evidence of follow-up.
- • Confirm medication concerns are linked to reviews, GP/pharmacy advice or care plan updates where needed.
- • Ask residents or relatives whether they feel listened to about medicines.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q33 | Unanswered
Across stock checks for a sample of residents, do actual quantities match expected balances, and where they do not, is there a clear explanation and timely investigation?
Evidence to check
- • Complete or review physical stock counts for selected medicines.
- • Compare expected balances with MAR entries, receipt records and returns.
- • Check whether low stock, overstocking or unexplained discrepancies are identified promptly.
- • Review actions taken for stock discrepancies or ordering problems.
- • Ask staff how they prevent residents running out of medicines.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q34 | Unanswered
For recently inducted staff, do induction records and supervision evidence show they completed observed medication rounds and were signed off only after demonstrating safe practice?
Evidence to check
- • Review induction records for new staff who administer or support medicines.
- • Check evidence of shadowing, observed rounds and practical competency sign-off.
- • Confirm new staff did not administer medicines unsupervised before assessment.
- • Review supervision notes for early practice concerns or support needs.
- • Ask recently inducted staff how they were assessed before administering medicines.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q35 | Unanswered
Have reflective discussions, debriefs, mock scenarios or scenario-based learning sessions taken place following medication incidents, and can staff describe what they learned from them?
Evidence to check
- • Review team meeting minutes, debrief notes, supervision records and training logs.
- • Check whether discussions used real incidents or realistic scenarios.
- • Ask staff what they learned and what changed in practice.
- • Look for evidence that learning was shared with all relevant shifts and staff groups.
- • Confirm follow-up checks tested whether learning was embedded.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q36 | Unanswered
When prescriptions are unclear, changed or appear unsafe, can staff explain and evidence how they escalate concerns promptly to pharmacy, GP, prescriber or senior staff?
Evidence to check
- • Review examples of prescription queries, medication changes or unclear instructions.
- • Check records of calls/emails to GP, pharmacy, prescriber or senior staff.
- • Ask staff what they would do if a prescription appears unsafe or unclear.
- • Look for evidence that medicines were withheld or escalated safely pending clarification where appropriate.
- • Confirm advice received was documented and reflected in MARs and care plans.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q37 | Unanswered
For residents on time-critical medicines, do records and staff practice show these are prioritised, administered at clinically appropriate times and escalated immediately if delayed or missed?
Evidence to check
- • Identify residents on time-critical medicines such as insulin, anticoagulants, Parkinson's medicines, epilepsy medicines or pain relief.
- • Review MAR times against prescribed or clinically required times.
- • Ask staff which medicines are time-critical and why timing matters.
- • Check escalation records for any late or missed time-critical doses.
- • Look for systems that help staff prioritise time-critical medicines during busy rounds.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q38 | Unanswered
Across a sample of residents with complex medication needs, does observed practice match the medication support plan, including prompts, explanation, preferred approach, swallowing support and monitoring?
Evidence to check
- • Review medication support plans for residents with swallowing difficulty, cognitive impairment, distress, sensory needs or complex routines.
- • Observe or discuss how staff support the resident in practice.
- • Check whether staff use the person's preferred approach and communication needs.
- • Look for evidence of monitoring after administration where risks are present.
- • Confirm the plan is reviewed when needs, capacity, medicines or risks change.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q39 | Unanswered
Across a sample of residents with medication discrepancies, high-risk medicines or recent changes, are differences between prescribed, received, stocked and administered medicines identified quickly and resolved with clear documentation?
Evidence to check
- • Compare prescriptions, MARs, stock, hospital letters and pharmacy records for selected residents.
- • Check whether discrepancies are recorded, escalated and resolved promptly.
- • Look for clinical input where high-risk medicines are involved.
- • Confirm staff do not administer based on assumptions where records conflict.
- • Review whether resolved discrepancies led to learning or system improvement.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q40 | Unanswered
Following hospital discharge or outpatient review, do records show medicines were reconciled promptly, staff were informed clearly, and changes were reflected in MARs, stock and care plans without unsafe delay?
Evidence to check
- • Review recent discharge summaries, outpatient letters and medication changes.
- • Check whether MAR charts were updated promptly and accurately.
- • Confirm discontinued medicines were removed from active use and new medicines obtained without delay.
- • Check communication to staff through handover, notes or alerts.
- • Look for duplicated, omitted or conflicting medicines after discharge or review.
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.
Your score and completion will update instantly.