Legionella Risk Assessment and Water System Checks Audit - Care Homes
Relevant CQC Fundamental Standards
Answered 0 / 32(0% complete)
Note: This is the "clipboard" version of the audit. Only allocate tasks to users once you are satisfied that the audit is complete and accurate. Once saved, it is added to your Compliance Calendar as the final version for that month, where you can allocate tasks, upload evidence, and manage actions.
Score
0%
N/A counts as Yes (full credit). Unanswered reduces the score until completed.
Breakdown
0 Yes •0 No •0 N/A •32 Unanswered
Answers Overview
Questions
0/32 answeredQ1 | Unanswered
Is there a current and suitable Legionella risk assessment, completed by a competent person, that reflects the actual water systems and resident risks in the home?
Evidence to check
- • Current Legionella risk assessment completed by a competent person or competent external contractor
- • Assessment covers hot and cold water systems, tanks, pipework, outlets, showers, thermostatic mixer valves and areas used by residents, staff and visitors
- • Assessment considers vulnerable residents, including those with respiratory conditions, reduced immunity or frailty
- • Recommendations are transferred into an action plan with named owners and timescales
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q2 | Unanswered
Is the Legionella risk assessment reviewed annually, or sooner when there are changes to the building, water system, use of rooms or resident risk profile?
Evidence to check
- • Review date is recorded and current
- • Risk assessment reviewed after plumbing works, refurbishment, changes in occupancy, room closures or system changes
- • Review considers whether control measures remain effective
- • Outdated assessments are replaced and staff are informed of changes
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q3 | Unanswered
Is there a named responsible person for Legionella and water safety who understands their duties and actively monitors compliance?
Evidence to check
- • Named responsible person and deputy are documented
- • Role responsibilities are clear, including monitoring, contractor oversight, records and escalation
- • Responsible person has appropriate training or evidence of competence
- • Water safety issues are reported to senior management where required
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q4 | Unanswered
Are written control measures in place and followed in practice, including temperature monitoring, flushing, descaling and maintenance schedules?
Evidence to check
- • Written control scheme or water safety plan is available
- • Temperature checks, flushing and cleaning schedules are clearly defined
- • Staff know what checks they are responsible for
- • Records show the control scheme is completed consistently and gaps are followed up
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q5 | Unanswered
Are hot water temperatures checked and recorded at sentinel outlets and other required outlets in line with the control scheme?
Evidence to check
- • Temperature monitoring log includes sentinel outlets
- • Checks are completed at the required frequency
- • Results are recorded accurately with date, time, outlet and person completing the check
- • Out-of-range results are escalated and corrective action is recorded
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q6 | Unanswered
Is hot water storage and distribution maintained at safe temperatures for Legionella control while managing scald risk for residents?
Evidence to check
- • Hot water storage temperature records show appropriate control
- • Outlet temperatures are monitored against the written control scheme
- • Scald risk is managed through thermostatic mixer valves, risk assessments and safe design
- • Any failure to reach required temperatures is investigated and corrected promptly
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q7 | Unanswered
Are cold water temperatures monitored to ensure water remains cold enough to reduce Legionella risk?
Evidence to check
- • Cold water temperature records are completed at required outlets
- • Records include whether temperature is achieved within the expected flow time
- • Warm cold-water results are investigated
- • Corrective action is recorded for insulation, stagnation or pipework concerns
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q8 | Unanswered
Are infrequently used outlets flushed at the required frequency to prevent water stagnation?
Evidence to check
- • Flushing schedule identifies low-use outlets, vacant rooms, en suites, showers, sluices and staff areas
- • Weekly or required-frequency flushing records are completed
- • Flushing records include date, outlet and person completing the task
- • Missed flushing is escalated and risk assessed
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q9 | Unanswered
Are shower heads and hoses cleaned, descaled and disinfected at the required frequency, with evidence that the work was completed properly?
Evidence to check
- • Shower head and hose cleaning or descaling schedule
- • Records show cleaning, descaling and disinfection dates
- • Showers are visually checked for scale, damage or poor water flow
- • Replacement or repair is arranged where cleaning is ineffective
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q10 | Unanswered
Is the cold-water storage tank inspected, clean, covered, insulated and protected from contamination?
Evidence to check
- • Tank inspection records are current
- • Tank is covered, insulated and protected from insects, debris or contamination
- • Water condition, sediment and temperature are checked where required
- • Cleaning, repair or remedial work is completed where concerns are found
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q11 | Unanswered
Are thermostatic mixer valves maintained so they reduce scald risk without compromising Legionella control?
Evidence to check
- • Thermostatic mixer valve servicing and maintenance records
- • Thermostatic mixer valve outlet temperatures are checked and recorded
- • Thermostatic mixer valves are cleaned, serviced or replaced according to the control scheme
- • Resident scald risk assessments link to thermostatic mixer valve use where relevant
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q12 | Unanswered
Is there an up-to-date schematic diagram of the water system that reflects the current layout of tanks, pipework, outlets and high-risk areas?
Evidence to check
- • Water system schematic is available
- • Diagram reflects current building layout and water system
- • Changes from refurbishment or plumbing works are added promptly
- • Responsible person and contractors use the schematic for monitoring and risk assessment
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q13 | Unanswered
Is there a complete water safety logbook or digital system that records temperature checks, flushing, cleaning, maintenance, sampling and remedial actions?
Evidence to check
- • Water safety logbook or digital record is organised and current
- • Records include monitoring, flushing, descaling, contractor visits, faults and corrective actions
- • Gaps in records are identified and investigated
- • Records are reviewed by the responsible person
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q14 | Unanswered
Where external contractors are used, is their competence checked and is there clear evidence of the work completed?
Evidence to check
- • Contractor competence, qualifications or service agreement evidence
- • Contractor reports include findings, readings, samples, recommendations and actions
- • Certificates, calibration records or service reports are retained
- • Responsible person reviews contractor reports and follows up actions
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q15 | Unanswered
Are Legionella and water safety records retained for the required period and available for inspection?
Evidence to check
- • Records are retained in line with health and safety guidance and organisational policy
- • Historical records are accessible for audits or inspections
- • Records include risk assessments, written scheme, monitoring, maintenance and remedial works
- • Records are stored securely and not lost when staff or contractors change
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q16 | Unanswered
Is water sampling or microbiological testing completed where required due to risk assessment findings, control failures or identified concerns?
Evidence to check
- • Sampling plan or contractor recommendation is recorded where applicable
- • Sampling results are reviewed promptly
- • Positive or concerning results trigger immediate risk controls and escalation
- • Remedial action and re-testing are documented where needed
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q17 | Unanswered
Are aerosol-producing systems and equipment, such as showers, assisted baths, whirlpool baths or specialist bathing equipment, risk assessed and controlled?
Evidence to check
- • Risk assessment includes aerosol-producing outlets and equipment
- • Cleaning, descaling and disinfection schedules are completed
- • Equipment is maintained according to manufacturer and water safety guidance
- • Staff know when equipment should be taken out of use due to water safety concerns
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q18 | Unanswered
Are water outlets in areas used by vulnerable residents checked and managed with appropriate priority?
Evidence to check
- • Monitoring includes resident bedrooms, en suites, assisted bathrooms and clinical areas
- • High-risk resident areas are included in the control scheme
- • Out-of-range readings in resident areas are escalated promptly
- • Alternative arrangements are made where water safety cannot be assured
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q19 | Unanswered
Is water system maintenance included in the Planned Preventative Maintenance schedule and completed on time?
Evidence to check
- • Planned preventative maintenance schedule includes water temperature monitoring, flushing, thermostatic mixer valves, tanks, showers, calorifiers and remedial works
- • Tasks are completed within planned timescales
- • Overdue maintenance is escalated
- • Maintenance actions are linked to the Legionella risk assessment
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q20 | Unanswered
Are all relevant areas of the home included in water safety checks, including staff rooms, kitchens, laundry, sluice rooms, storage areas and external taps?
Evidence to check
- • Outlet inventory includes all areas of the home
- • Non-resident areas are included in flushing and temperature checks where required
- • External taps or rarely used outlets are considered
- • Changes in room use are reflected in monitoring schedules
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q21 | Unanswered
Are vacant rooms, closed areas or low-use outlets managed with enhanced flushing or other controls to prevent stagnation?
Evidence to check
- • Vacant room and low-use outlet register is current
- • Flushing is completed for vacant rooms and closed areas
- • Rooms brought back into use are checked before occupation
- • Occupancy changes are communicated to the person responsible for water safety
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q22 | Unanswered
Are staff aware of Legionella risks, signs of Legionnaires' disease and how to report water safety concerns?
Evidence to check
- • Relevant staff have water safety or Legionella awareness training
- • Staff know how to report unusual water temperature, discolouration, low flow, scale, leaks or illness concerns
- • Clinical staff know to escalate respiratory illness clusters or suspected Legionnaires' disease
- • Water safety concerns raised by staff are recorded and acted on
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q23 | Unanswered
Is there a contingency plan for suspected Legionella, water contamination, loss of hot water, loss of cold water or water system failure?
Evidence to check
- • Contingency plan covers water failure, contamination, positive samples and outbreak response
- • Plan includes alternative water supplies, bathing arrangements, drinking water and communication
- • Escalation routes include senior leaders, contractors, public health, local authority or environmental health where required
- • Staff know immediate actions such as taking outlets out of use where instructed
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q24 | Unanswered
Is refurbishment, plumbing work or system alteration reviewed to ensure it does not increase Legionella risk?
Evidence to check
- • Records of plumbing works, refurbishment or system changes
- • Risk assessment reviewed after works
- • Dead legs, redundant pipework, cross-connections or stagnation risks are identified and removed where possible
- • Contractors provide evidence that works were completed safely
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q25 | Unanswered
Are residents, staff and visitors protected from scalding through safe water temperatures, thermostatic mixer valves, risk assessments and prompt action on hot water concerns?
Evidence to check
- • Scald risk assessments are completed for residents at risk
- • Thermostatic mixer valves are fitted and checked where required
- • Hot water outlet temperatures are monitored
- • Excessively hot water is escalated immediately and controlled until resolved
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q26 | Unanswered
Are Legionella compliance audits completed and used to improve water safety practice?
Evidence to check
- • Internal or external Legionella audit records
- • Audit checks risk assessment, logbook, monitoring, flushing, contractor actions and staff knowledge
- • Actions have owners, timescales and completion evidence
- • Repeat gaps are escalated through governance
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q27 | Unanswered
Are Legionella incidents, near misses, out-of-range readings or water contamination concerns investigated and acted on promptly?
Evidence to check
- • Incident or exception records for water safety concerns
- • Immediate control actions are recorded
- • Root cause and remedial works are identified
- • Learning is shared and monitoring adjusted where needed
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q28 | Unanswered
Is evidence of Legionella and water safety compliance organised and readily available for CQC, HSE, Environmental Health or internal inspection?
Evidence to check
- • Risk assessment, written scheme, monitoring records, contractor reports and action plans are easily accessible
- • Records are complete and up to date
- • Responsible person can explain the evidence confidently
- • Missing evidence is identified and corrected before inspection
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q29 | Unanswered
Are Legionella, water safety, infection prevention and health and safety policies aligned so staff receive consistent guidance?
Evidence to check
- • Relevant policies are cross-referenced and consistent
- • Water safety links to infection prevention, premises safety, COSHH, outbreak management and business continuity
- • Staff guidance does not conflict between policies
- • Policy updates are communicated to relevant staff
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q30 | Unanswered
Are occupancy changes, resident admissions, discharges, room closures or room rotations factored into flushing and monitoring routines?
Evidence to check
- • System for notifying water safety lead of room occupancy changes
- • Vacant or low-use rooms added to flushing schedule promptly
- • Rooms are checked before being reoccupied
- • Monitoring schedule reflects current room use
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q31 | Unanswered
Where the building is leased or water systems are shared, is there clear collaboration with the landlord, property manager or other duty holders to ensure water safety responsibilities are met?
Evidence to check
- • Written agreement or communication clarifies responsibilities
- • Landlord or property manager provides relevant risk assessments, servicing or remedial evidence
- • Shared system risks are reviewed and escalated where needed
- • The care provider does not assume compliance without evidence
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q32 | Unanswered
Do Legionella audits check whether water safety controls are actually effective, not only whether logs are completed?
Evidence to check
- • Audit includes spot checks of outlets, temperatures, flushing evidence and staff understanding
- • Records are compared with actual room use and water system risks
- • Out-of-range trends and repeated gaps are analysed
- • Actions from audits lead to safer water management and reduced risk
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.
Your score and completion will update instantly.