Environmental Safety Audit - Supported Living
Relevant CQC Fundamental Standards
Answered 0 / 31(0% complete)
Note: This is the "clipboard" version of the audit. Only allocate tasks to users once you are satisfied that the audit is complete and accurate. Once saved, it is added to your Compliance Calendar as the final version for that month, where you can allocate tasks, upload evidence, and manage actions.
Score
0%
N/A counts as Yes (full credit). Unanswered reduces the score until completed.
Breakdown
0 Yes •0 No •0 N/A •31 Unanswered
Answers Overview
Questions
0/31 answeredQ1 | Unanswered
Are environmental risk assessments completed for each supported living property and used in practice to keep tenants safe while respecting their rights and independence?
Evidence to check
- • Environmental risk assessment for each property or tenant setting
- • Assessment covers private areas, shared areas, access, lighting, flooring, fire safety, utilities and security
- • Tenant-specific risks are included, such as mobility, cognition, sensory needs, self-neglect or behaviours of distress
- • Assessments are reviewed after incidents, changes in needs, new equipment, repairs or environmental concerns
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q2 | Unanswered
Are shared spaces, where present, maintained, clean and free from avoidable hazards that could affect tenants, staff or visitors?
Evidence to check
- • Walkaround of shared kitchens, lounges, bathrooms, corridors, entrances and stairways
- • No avoidable trip hazards, blocked routes, damaged furniture or unsafe storage
- • Cleaning and maintenance records for shared areas
- • Responsibilities for shared areas are clear between tenants, staff, landlord and housing provider
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q3 | Unanswered
Are hazards such as uneven flooring, loose carpets, damaged thresholds, trailing wires or poor lighting identified quickly and followed through to resolution?
Evidence to check
- • Hazard reports or maintenance logs
- • Dates reported, chased and resolved are recorded
- • Temporary safety measures are used while waiting for repair
- • Repeated or unresolved hazards are escalated to managers, landlord, housing provider or commissioners
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q4 | Unanswered
Where tenants need handrails, non-slip flooring, adapted bathrooms or other safety features, are these provided, reviewed and used in a way that supports independence?
Evidence to check
- • Occupational therapy or professional assessment where relevant
- • Support plan records equipment or adaptations needed
- • Adaptations are suitable, safe and in good repair
- • Tenant feedback confirms adaptations support independence rather than unnecessary restriction
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q5 | Unanswered
Are fire exits clearly marked, accessible and free from obstruction in both shared and relevant private areas?
Evidence to check
- • Fire exit routes checked during walkaround
- • Fire exits and escape routes are not blocked by furniture, rubbish, mobility equipment or personal items
- • Signage is clear and visible where required
- • Staff and tenants know what to do if escape routes become blocked
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q6 | Unanswered
Are fire drills, evacuation practice or fire safety discussions adapted to each tenant’s needs and used to improve real readiness?
Evidence to check
- • Fire drill, evacuation practice or fire safety discussion records
- • Tenants are supported to understand evacuation procedures in a way they can access
- • Staff understand each tenant’s evacuation needs
- • Learning from drills or fire safety concerns is recorded and acted on
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q7 | Unanswered
Are environmental safety responsibilities clearly agreed between the care provider, landlord, housing association and tenants, and do staff know how to escalate issues?
Evidence to check
- • Responsibility agreement, service level agreement or local protocol
- • Responsibilities for repairs, communal areas, fire safety, cleaning, pest control, utilities and adaptations are clear
- • Staff know what to report to the housing provider or landlord
- • Issues are tracked so they are not lost between agencies
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q8 | Unanswered
Are communal cleaning responsibilities clearly defined, completed and reviewed where shared areas are used by tenants?
Evidence to check
- • Cleaning schedule for communal areas
- • Records show cleaning is completed as agreed
- • Tenant, staff, cleaner, landlord or housing provider responsibilities are clear
- • Cleaning concerns are escalated where shared areas become unsafe or unhygienic
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q9 | Unanswered
Is the environment monitored for strong odours, damp, mould, pests or infestation, and are concerns escalated promptly?
Evidence to check
- • Walkaround observations
- • Records of damp, mould, odour, pest or infestation concerns
- • Escalation to landlord, housing provider, environmental health or safeguarding where needed
- • Temporary controls are considered where the issue affects health or dignity
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q10 | Unanswered
Where window restrictors or other safety controls are used, are they risk-assessed, proportionate and reviewed without unnecessarily limiting tenant rights?
Evidence to check
- • Risk assessment for window restrictors or access restrictions
- • Tenant’s capacity, consent and wishes are considered
- • Least restrictive options are explored
- • Controls are reviewed when risk changes
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q11 | Unanswered
Is lighting sufficient in bedrooms, hallways, bathrooms, entrances and outdoor areas to reduce risk while supporting comfort and independence?
Evidence to check
- • Lighting checked during day and low-light periods where possible
- • Broken bulbs, poor lighting or dark areas are reported and followed up
- • Lighting needs of tenants with visual impairment, falls risk or anxiety are considered
- • Tenant preferences around lighting are respected where safe
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q12 | Unanswered
Are outdoor areas such as paths, gardens, ramps, driveways and entrances safe, accessible and free from avoidable hazards?
Evidence to check
- • External walkaround checks
- • No unmanaged slip, trip, ice, leaves, uneven paving or poor lighting risks
- • Access routes are suitable for tenants using mobility aids where relevant
- • Outdoor hazards are reported to the responsible person or agency
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q13 | Unanswered
Are tenants supported to report environmental hazards themselves where possible, promoting autonomy, confidence and responsibility?
Evidence to check
- • Support plans identify how tenants are supported to report repairs or hazards
- • Staff encourage tenants to contact landlord or housing provider where appropriate
- • Accessible information about reporting repairs is available
- • Staff step in where the tenant cannot report or where risk is urgent
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q14 | Unanswered
Are adaptations and accessibility features reviewed when tenants’ needs, mobility, cognition or health change?
Evidence to check
- • Review records consider whether adaptations remain suitable
- • Referrals to OT, physiotherapy, housing provider or equipment services where needed
- • Support plan updated after changes in mobility or ability
- • Faulty, unsuitable or unused adaptations are followed up
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q15 | Unanswered
Are environmental safety checks carried out during home visits, key worker reviews or support planning, and are concerns acted on?
Evidence to check
- • Home visit notes or key worker review records include environmental observations
- • Staff record hazards, repairs or changes in living conditions
- • Concerns are escalated and tracked
- • Repeated environmental issues are reviewed for wider risk or safeguarding
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q16 | Unanswered
Are tenants supported to keep their homes clean and safe in a way that respects privacy, choice, capacity and independence?
Evidence to check
- • Support plan records the tenant’s cleaning support needs and preferences
- • Staff encourage independence and do not take over unnecessarily
- • Refusals or concerns are recorded respectfully
- • Privacy and consent are respected before entering or checking private areas
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q17 | Unanswered
Is there a respectful and proportionate process for responding to unsafe living conditions such as hoarding, self-neglect, poor hygiene or fire risk?
Evidence to check
- • Risk assessment for hoarding, self-neglect or unsafe home conditions
- • Tenant is involved in decisions wherever possible
- • Capacity, consent and safeguarding are considered
- • Multi-agency support is sought where needed, such as housing, fire service, social worker or environmental health
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q18 | Unanswered
Is waste disposal managed safely and regularly in shared and private areas where the service has a role?
Evidence to check
- • Waste disposal arrangements are clear
- • Bins are not overflowing or creating odour, pests or fire risk
- • Tenants are supported to manage waste where this is part of their support plan
- • Clinical, continence or hazardous waste arrangements are in place where required
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q19 | Unanswered
Is personal safety considered in shared environments, including safe entry and exit, visitor access, unknown persons, anti-social behaviour and tenant compatibility?
Evidence to check
- • Risk assessments cover shared living and access risks
- • Visitor or access concerns are recorded and escalated
- • Tenants’ rights to visitors are balanced with known risks
- • Incidents involving co-tenants, visitors or neighbours are reviewed
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q20 | Unanswered
Are tenancy rights and privacy respected when staff address environmental risks in a tenant’s personal space?
Evidence to check
- • Staff seek permission before entering private areas unless there is immediate risk
- • Support plans identify agreed access arrangements
- • Environmental concerns are discussed respectfully with the tenant
- • Restrictions or access controls are legally justified and reviewed
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q21 | Unanswered
Are gas, electricity and water systems checked and maintained by qualified professionals, with concerns escalated until resolved?
Evidence to check
- • Gas safety, electrical safety or water safety records where available to the provider
- • Responsibilities for statutory checks are clear
- • Staff know how to report suspected gas, electrical or water hazards
- • Outstanding safety checks or faults are escalated to landlord, housing provider or management
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q22 | Unanswered
Are heating and ventilation systems functional, safe and suitable for tenants’ needs across all seasons?
Evidence to check
- • Heating and ventilation concerns recorded and followed up
- • Tenants at risk from cold, heat, respiratory illness or poor ventilation are identified
- • Landlord or housing provider repairs are tracked
- • Temporary support is considered where heating or ventilation failure affects safety
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q23 | Unanswered
Are temperature extremes such as heatwaves, cold weather or loss of heating considered in risk assessments for vulnerable tenants?
Evidence to check
- • Hot and cold weather risk assessments or contingency plans
- • Tenants at higher risk are identified
- • Support plans include hydration, welfare checks, heating, cooling or clothing support where relevant
- • Concerns are escalated to housing, family, GP or emergency services where required
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q24 | Unanswered
Is emergency lighting and signage in place, functional and maintained where legally required?
Evidence to check
- • Emergency lighting and signage checks where applicable
- • Faults are reported and tracked
- • Staff know who is responsible for maintenance
- • Signage is accessible and appropriate to the setting
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q25 | Unanswered
Are personalisation and tenant choice supported in room design and home layout without compromising safety?
Evidence to check
- • Tenant preferences and personal belongings are respected
- • Risk assessments consider layout, clutter, mobility and fire safety
- • Staff do not remove or rearrange belongings without consent unless urgent safety action is needed
- • Support balances ordinary home life with proportionate risk management
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q26 | Unanswered
Are environmental hazards reviewed after incidents, complaints, near misses or changes in tenant health, mobility or behaviour?
Evidence to check
- • Incident and complaint records trigger environmental review
- • Risk assessments updated after falls, fire concerns, self-neglect, aggression or deterioration
- • Actions are recorded and followed up
- • Learning is shared with staff and relevant housing partners
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q27 | Unanswered
Are landlords or housing associations responsive to reported environmental safety issues, and does the care provider escalate delays where risk remains?
Evidence to check
- • Repairs and hazard tracker includes report, chase and completion dates
- • Response times are monitored
- • Unresolved risks are escalated to senior managers, commissioners, safeguarding or environmental health where needed
- • Temporary risk controls are recorded while waiting for repairs
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q28 | Unanswered
Is environmental safety discussed in governance, audits or partnership meetings so themes and unresolved risks are addressed?
Evidence to check
- • Governance or partnership meeting minutes
- • Environmental incidents, repairs, complaints and hazards are reviewed for themes
- • Actions have owners and timescales
- • Learning improves practice, support planning or partnership working
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q29 | Unanswered
Are staff clear about when an environmental concern becomes a safeguarding concern, such as self-neglect, neglect by others, exploitation or unsafe living conditions?
Evidence to check
- • Staff can describe when to escalate environmental risks as safeguarding
- • Records show safeguarding considered for serious or repeated environmental concerns
- • Rationale recorded where safeguarding referral is not made
- • Multi-agency action is taken where environmental risks remain high
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q30 | Unanswered
Are environmental safety audits checking real conditions and tenant experience, not only paperwork or landlord assurances?
Evidence to check
- • Audit includes walkaround observations where appropriate
- • Tenant feedback is included where possible
- • Audit checks whether reported issues were actually resolved
- • Actions are tracked and reviewed for effectiveness
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q31 | Unanswered
Are environmental controls reviewed to ensure they do not create blanket restrictions or make the property feel institutional?
Evidence to check
- • Risk controls are tenant-specific and proportionate
- • Tenant choice and ordinary home life are considered
- • Restrictions such as locked cupboards, restricted access or removed items are justified and reviewed
- • Managers challenge unnecessary institutional practice
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.
Your score and completion will update instantly.