Environment Safety Audit - Care Homes
Relevant CQC Fundamental Standards
Answered 0 / 30(0% complete)
Note: This is the "clipboard" version of the audit. Only allocate tasks to users once you are satisfied that the audit is complete and accurate. Once saved, it is added to your Compliance Calendar as the final version for that month, where you can allocate tasks, upload evidence, and manage actions.
Score
0%
N/A counts as Yes (full credit). Unanswered reduces the score until completed.
Breakdown
0 Yes •0 No •0 N/A •30 Unanswered
Answers Overview
Questions
0/30 answeredQ1 | Unanswered
1. When staff are asked about environmental safety, can they explain how they identify, report and reduce risks across the care home in day-to-day practice?
Evidence to check
- • Staff can explain practical environmental safety responsibilities
- • Environmental safety policy is current, accessible and understood
- • Staff know how to report hazards and urgent risks
- • Policy is reflected in walkaround checks, maintenance logs and observed practice
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q2 | Unanswered
2. Are environmental risk assessments completed for internal and external areas, and do they lead to practical actions that reduce risks to residents, visitors and staff?
Evidence to check
- • Environmental risk assessments for lounges, bedrooms, bathrooms, corridors, kitchens, gardens and entrances
- • Risk assessments reflect current resident needs
- • Actions are recorded, risk-rated and followed up
- • Reviews take place after incidents, refurbishment or changes in resident needs
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q3 | Unanswered
3. During walkaround checks, are floors, corridors and stairwells consistently free from trip hazards, clutter, trailing wires and obstructions?
Evidence to check
- • Walkaround observation of corridors, stairs and communal areas
- • No equipment, laundry, boxes or furniture blocking routes
- • Trip hazards are removed or risk-managed promptly
- • Repeated hazards are escalated through maintenance or management review
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q4 | Unanswered
4. Is lighting suitable in all areas to support safe movement, personal care and wayfinding, especially in bathrooms, corridors, staircases and bedrooms?
Evidence to check
- • Observation of lighting during day and low-light periods where possible
- • Broken bulbs, dark areas or glare are reported and repaired
- • Lighting supports night-time checks and resident movement
- • Falls or incidents are reviewed for lighting-related factors
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q5 | Unanswered
5. Are handrails, grab rails and non-slip flooring available where needed, safe to use and suitable for residents' mobility needs?
Evidence to check
- • Handrails and grab rails are secure and correctly positioned
- • Non-slip flooring is present in higher-risk areas where required
- • Resident mobility and falls risks are reflected in environmental adaptations
- • Damaged or loose rails and flooring are repaired promptly
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q6 | Unanswered
6. Are fire exits clearly marked, unobstructed and easy to open from inside, including for staff supporting residents during evacuation?
Evidence to check
- • Fire exits clearly signed and visible
- • Exit routes are unobstructed
- • Doors open easily from inside where required
- • Staff know how to use evacuation routes and report blocked exits
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q7 | Unanswered
7. Are evacuation plans, fire signage and emergency instructions visible, understood by staff and adapted to residents' needs where appropriate?
Evidence to check
- • Fire action notices and evacuation signage displayed
- • Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans are available and current
- • Staff can explain evacuation arrangements for dependent residents
- • Residents are supported to understand emergency arrangements where appropriate
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q8 | Unanswered
8. Does the layout of the home support safe movement and orientation for residents with mobility needs, dementia, sensory impairment or cognitive impairment?
Evidence to check
- • Observation of layout, corridors, furniture placement and access routes
- • Residents can move safely with walking aids, wheelchairs or staff support
- • Layout reduces confusion, distress and avoidable falls
- • Care plans and environmental controls reflect resident needs
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q9 | Unanswered
9. Are outdoor areas, including gardens, paths, ramps, entrances and seating areas, safe, maintained and accessible for residents who use them?
Evidence to check
- • Walkaround of outdoor areas
- • Paths are even, well lit and free from slip or trip hazards
- • Outdoor furniture is stable and suitable
- • Access risks such as ice, leaves, poor surfaces or broken gates are managed
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q10 | Unanswered
10. Are room temperatures and environmental conditions monitored so residents are protected from heat, cold, poor ventilation and discomfort?
Evidence to check
- • Temperature monitoring records where required
- • Action taken during heatwaves, cold weather or heating failure
- • Resident-specific risks considered, such as frailty or inability to communicate discomfort
- • Staff can explain escalation arrangements for unsafe temperatures
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q11 | Unanswered
11. Are cleaning and hygiene standards maintained in practice across bedrooms, communal areas, bathrooms, toilets and high-touch surfaces?
Evidence to check
- • Observation of cleanliness throughout the home
- • Cleaning records match actual cleanliness
- • High-touch areas are cleaned regularly
- • Concerns about cleanliness are reported and acted on promptly
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q12 | Unanswered
12. Are bathrooms and toilets clean, dry, safe and equipped with suitable features to reduce falls, infection risks and loss of dignity?
Evidence to check
- • Bathrooms and toilets are visibly clean and dry
- • Grab rails, call bells and non-slip features are present where needed
- • No unsafe mats, leaks or wet floors
- • Privacy, dignity and accessibility are maintained
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q13 | Unanswered
13. Are hazardous substances stored securely, labelled correctly and inaccessible to residents who may be at risk?
Evidence to check
- • COSHH storage areas are locked or controlled
- • Chemicals are labelled and stored safely
- • No cleaning products left unattended in resident areas
- • Staff understand safe storage and escalation of spills or exposure
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q14 | Unanswered
14. Are kitchen, laundry and utility areas clean, safe and secured where necessary to protect residents from avoidable harm?
Evidence to check
- • Restricted areas are secured where risk requires it
- • Kitchen, laundry and utility areas are clean and organised
- • Hot surfaces, chemicals, sharp items and equipment risks are managed
- • Residents' independence and access are balanced with safety
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q15 | Unanswered
15. Are staff areas kept safe, tidy and appropriately separate from resident areas without compromising resident privacy, dignity or safety?
Evidence to check
- • Staff areas are clean, safe and free from hazards
- • Confidential information is not visible to residents or visitors
- • Staff belongings do not create risks in resident areas
- • Staff use designated areas appropriately
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q16 | Unanswered
16. Are window restrictors fitted where required, checked regularly and maintained so residents are protected from falls without unnecessary restriction?
Evidence to check
- • Window restrictor checks
- • Risk assessments identify where restrictors are needed
- • Restrictors are intact and functioning
- • Restrictions are proportionate and reviewed where they affect liberty or comfort
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q17 | Unanswered
17. Are noise levels monitored and managed so the environment does not cause avoidable distress, agitation, sleep disruption or reduced wellbeing?
Evidence to check
- • Observation of communal areas, corridors and night-time routines where possible
- • Resident feedback about noise or disturbance
- • Staff respond to noise-related distress
- • Environmental or routine changes made where noise affects residents
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q18 | Unanswered
18. Is lighting suitable for residents with visual impairment or dementia, avoiding glare, shadows, poor contrast and confusing reflections?
Evidence to check
- • Observation of lighting, shadows and glare
- • Resident-specific visual needs reflected in care plans
- • Falls, distress or confusion reviewed for environmental causes
- • Adjustments made where lighting creates risk or confusion
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q19 | Unanswered
19. Are dementia-friendly and sensory adaptations used where appropriate to support orientation, independence, calm and safe movement?
Evidence to check
- • Clear signage, contrast colours and orientation cues
- • Residents can identify bedrooms, bathrooms and communal areas
- • Adaptations reflect current resident needs
- • Resident feedback or behaviour indicates whether adaptations are effective
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q20 | Unanswered
20. Are all areas free from offensive odours and ventilated in a way that supports comfort, infection prevention and dignity?
Evidence to check
- • Observation of odours and ventilation across the home
- • Odour sources investigated rather than masked
- • Ventilation used safely and appropriately
- • Concerns linked to continence, waste, laundry or cleaning are acted on
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q21 | Unanswered
21. Are doors and key areas clearly labelled or recognisable so residents can navigate the home independently where possible?
Evidence to check
- • Bedroom, bathroom and communal area signage is clear
- • Signage is suitable for residents with dementia, sight loss or cognitive impairment
- • Personalised bedroom cues used where appropriate
- • Residents are observed finding key areas safely where possible
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q22 | Unanswered
22. Is the layout of the home reviewed when residents' needs change, so the environment remains safe, accessible and suitable?
Evidence to check
- • Environmental reviews following changes in resident dependency
- • Furniture, equipment and layout adjusted where needed
- • Falls, incidents or distress prompt environmental review
- • Resident and staff feedback considered in layout changes
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q23 | Unanswered
23. Is the cleaning schedule used effectively to maintain real cleanliness, with checks confirming that cleaning is completed to the required standard?
Evidence to check
- • Cleaning schedules and sign-off records
- • Manager or senior staff cleaning checks
- • Cleaning records match observed standards
- • Missed cleaning or poor standards are escalated and corrected
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q24 | Unanswered
24. Are incidents linked to environmental hazards recorded, investigated and used to prevent recurrence?
Evidence to check
- • Incident records involving slips, trips, falls, burns, access issues or environmental hazards
- • Root causes and contributing environmental factors identified
- • Risk assessments and maintenance actions updated after incidents
- • Learning shared with staff
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q25 | Unanswered
25. When hazards such as leaks, damaged flooring, broken fixtures, faulty lighting or unsafe furniture are reported, are they acted on promptly and risk-managed until resolved?
Evidence to check
- • Maintenance logs
- • Dates reported, actioned and completed
- • Temporary controls in place while awaiting repair
- • Overdue repairs are escalated through management
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q26 | Unanswered
26. Is pest control managed proactively, with environmental risks identified, reported and resolved before they affect resident safety or dignity?
Evidence to check
- • Pest control records
- • Kitchen, waste and storage areas checked for pest risks
- • Staff know how to report signs of pests
- • Actions from pest control visits are completed
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q27 | Unanswered
27. Are lighting, sockets, extension leads and power sources checked regularly to reduce electrical and fire risks?
Evidence to check
- • Electrical inspection or maintenance records
- • No overloaded sockets, unsafe extension leads or damaged cables
- • Faults reported and repaired promptly
- • Resident-owned electrical items considered where relevant
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q28 | Unanswered
28. Does the decor, colour scheme, furniture, personalisation and sensory environment support residents' dignity, comfort, orientation and wellbeing?
Evidence to check
- • Observation of communal and private spaces
- • Residents can personalise bedrooms where appropriate
- • Decor is not institutional, confusing or distressing
- • Environment supports calm, identity and meaningful occupation
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q29 | Unanswered
29. Are residents and families asked about the environment, and is their feedback used to make practical improvements?
Evidence to check
- • Resident and family meeting minutes
- • Environmental feedback surveys or comments
- • Complaints and compliments about the environment reviewed
- • Changes made following feedback
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.Q30 | Unanswered
30. Is environmental safety monitored through governance, with trends, hazards, repairs, incidents and resident feedback reviewed and acted on?
Evidence to check
- • Governance or quality meeting records
- • Environmental audit and maintenance trend reports
- • Actions tracked to completion
- • Senior management oversight of repeated or high-risk environmental issues
Supporting NotesNo notes yet.Notes are stamped with your name, date and time.
Your score and completion will update instantly.