Supervision and Appraisal Audit - Domiciliary Care
Your Score: 0%
- Q1: Is there a supervision policy outlining frequency, purpose, and documentation standards?
- Q2: Do all staff receive one-to-one supervision at least every 8–12 weeks as per policy?
- Q3: Are supervisions clearly documented with agreed actions and dates for review?
- Q4: Is the quality and effectiveness of care delivery discussed during supervision?
- Q5: Are staff competencies, training needs, and personal development reviewed regularly?
- Q6: Is safeguarding awareness and reflection routinely discussed during supervision?
- Q7: Are mental health and emotional wellbeing addressed as part of supportive supervision?
- Q8: Are supervisions used to reinforce values-based care and person-centred practices?
- Q9: Are staff encouraged to reflect on difficult cases, incidents, or ethical dilemmas?
- Q10: Is feedback from service users included or discussed where relevant in supervision?
- Q11: Do supervision records include follow-up on agreed actions from previous meetings?
- Q12: Are supervision meetings held in a confidential, structured, and supportive setting?
- Q13: Are supervisors trained to deliver effective, supportive, and constructive supervisions?
- Q14: Is there a system in place to ensure supervisions are scheduled and not missed?
- Q15: Are spot checks or field observations used to inform discussions during supervision?
- Q16: Is feedback from peers, service users, or families considered during supervision where appropriate?
- Q17: Do probationary staff receive enhanced supervision and support in the first 3–6 months?
- Q18: Is there a clear and documented annual appraisal process for all staff?
- Q19: Are appraisals used to review performance, set objectives, and discuss career aspirations?
- Q20: Do appraisals include a summary of the year’s supervision and training records?
- Q21: Are appraisals linked to the organisation’s values, goals, and quality improvement plans?
- Q22: Is staff satisfaction with the appraisal process captured and used to make improvements?
- Q23: Is performance against the Code of Conduct and professional standards reviewed annually?
- Q24: Are high-performing staff identified and encouraged to develop into senior or specialist roles?
- Q25: Are underperformance issues addressed through supportive action plans or retraining?
- Q26: Are supervision and appraisal records stored securely and accessible for quality checks?
- Q27: Is there oversight by senior management to ensure compliance with supervision and appraisal cycles?
- Q28: Is data from supervision and appraisals used in workforce planning and quality assurance?
- Q29: Do managers receive supervision and appraisal themselves, promoting a culture of support at all levels?
- Q30: Are supervision and appraisal outcomes linked to staff retention and recognition strategies?